<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competency frameworks, Learning and Development and the CIPD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/</link>
	<description>People and Performance, Learning and Measurement, Human Capital and Talent Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IBM Survey: Capability management key to successful workforce &#171; Donald H Taylor</title>
		<link>http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM Survey: Capability management key to successful workforce &#171; Donald H Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>[...] This is only one of many parts of the report that prove to me that it is rooted in practical experience (and not just because it agrees with my own prejudices on competency frameworks). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is only one of many parts of the report that prove to me that it is rooted in practical experience (and not just because it agrees with my own prejudices on competency frameworks). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donaldhtaylor</title>
		<link>http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>donaldhtaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 07:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Hi Donald, 

Yes, I noticed that gap myself. I think it&#039;s evidence that L&amp;D exists in a silo in most organisations - like most processes, in fact. 

Competency frameworks are used, but usually only for appraisals. Recruitment, L&amp;D and job profile writing, which could all benefit from  a shared view of competencies, are all too often tackled as separate, discrete processes.

The good news is that things are - slowly - changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donald, </p>
<p>Yes, I noticed that gap myself. I think it&#8217;s evidence that L&amp;D exists in a silo in most organisations &#8211; like most processes, in fact. </p>
<p>Competency frameworks are used, but usually only for appraisals. Recruitment, L&amp;D and job profile writing, which could all benefit from  a shared view of competencies, are all too often tackled as separate, discrete processes.</p>
<p>The good news is that things are &#8211; slowly &#8211; changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Clark</title>
		<link>http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donaldhtaylor.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/competency-frameworks-learning-and-development-and-the-cipd/#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sixty per cent of organisations have a competency framework in place for their staff, and just under half (48%) of those who haven’t say they intend to introduce one in the next two years.&quot;

If this is true why do they make no appearance when it comes to designing and discussing training? I&#039;ve spent decades working across most sectors and can barely think of a single meeting where competency frameworks were discussed, presented or used as the basis of training design.

Wain is right - HR has an enormous capacity for self-deception or an enormous capacity for producing paperwork then ignoring it in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sixty per cent of organisations have a competency framework in place for their staff, and just under half (48%) of those who haven’t say they intend to introduce one in the next two years.&#8221;</p>
<p>If this is true why do they make no appearance when it comes to designing and discussing training? I&#8217;ve spent decades working across most sectors and can barely think of a single meeting where competency frameworks were discussed, presented or used as the basis of training design.</p>
<p>Wain is right &#8211; HR has an enormous capacity for self-deception or an enormous capacity for producing paperwork then ignoring it in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
